Talk:Classical theism - Wikipedia - Recent changes [en]

:This was a very drastic change, and I'm not sure about the source. The connection made seems weak at best from what I'm reading, especially if that's the only source we have for this view... I have trouble believing that all the editors who worked on bringing this up to GA missed such a big crucial element of the story. I think @[[User:Brent Silby|Brent Silby]] or @[[User:Bsilby|Bsilby]] might be better suited to comment further. -- [[User:MediaKyle|MediaKyle]] ([[User talk:MediaKyle|talk]]) 18:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

:This was a very drastic change, and I'm not sure about the source. The connection made seems weak at best from what I'm reading, especially if that's the only source we have for this view... I have trouble believing that all the editors who worked on bringing this up to GA missed such a big crucial element of the story. I think @[[User:Brent Silby|Brent Silby]] or @[[User:Bsilby|Bsilby]] might be better suited to comment further. -- [[User:MediaKyle|MediaKyle]] ([[User talk:MediaKyle|talk]]) 18:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

::'''note:''' Vishishtadvaita School has a Classical Theistic onthology in principle, and David Bentley Hart mentions parallels between Vishishtadvaita Vedanta and Classical Theism on his works, but unfortunately the references on this matter are scarce. On the other hand, this article is full of sources that do not mention the phrase "classical theism" directly (including most used references of Anthony Kenny's "The God of the Philosophers", Brian Davies' "The Thought of Thomas Aquinas", and primary sources such as Aristotle's Metaphysics and Aquinas' Summa Theologica), and it's quite natural for such an article that is ought to be comprehensively addressed yet does not have enough representation on the academia. Thus direct phrase references on sources should not be necessary (nor it is applied to other matters of this article) and yet I provided one at the beggining of the Hinduism section, and the article is mostly written upon validity of principles and Vishishtadvaita undoubtedly satisfies all of those aforementioned principles (i.e. absoluteness, perfectness and transcendence of God; and attributes of aseity, divine simplicity, eternality, immutability, omnibenevolence, omnipotence, and omniscience). —[[User:Krsnaquli|'''<span style="color:#004949">Krsnaquli</span>''']] || [[User talk:Krsnaquli|<span style="color:#5E0000">'''Contact'''</span>]] - 23:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC)