EllaMinnowPea371: Reply
← Previous revision | Revision as of 10:43, 5 July 2025 | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::Thank you!! [[User:EllaMinnowPea371|EllaMinnowPea371]] ([[User talk:EllaMinnowPea371|talk]]) 19:32, 2 July 2025 (UTC) |
::Thank you!! [[User:EllaMinnowPea371|EllaMinnowPea371]] ([[User talk:EllaMinnowPea371|talk]]) 19:32, 2 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
::{{Reply to|It is a wonderful world}} Hi again, thanks for all your help so far on [[Talk:Mizo_people/GA1]]. I did a spot check of the article and it failed, as you predicted (some of my comments are currently at the top of my [[User:EllaMinnowPea371/sandbox|sandbox]]). My plan right now is to fail the article, but I wanted to check in with you and confirm that that's the right thing to do. [[User:EllaMinnowPea371|EllaMinnowPea371]] ([[User talk:EllaMinnowPea371|talk]]) 02:54, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
::{{Reply to|It is a wonderful world}} Hi again, thanks for all your help so far on [[Talk:Mizo_people/GA1]]. I did a spot check of the article and it failed, as you predicted (some of my comments are currently at the top of my [[User:EllaMinnowPea371/sandbox|sandbox]]). My plan right now is to fail the article, but I wanted to check in with you and confirm that that's the right thing to do. [[User:EllaMinnowPea371|EllaMinnowPea371]] ([[User talk:EllaMinnowPea371|talk]]) 02:54, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
:::Yes I would fail. In terms of TSI, this is near the worst you will generally find in a GAN. Make sure you put the spot check on the GAN page, so any future reviewers can see it when/if it is renominated. I would highly recommend writing an encouraging message to the newer nominator before failing, as although the article is far from GA, they have made significant improvements to it. You can also encourage further collaboration on the article talk page if you are comfortable with that. The article [[Washington University in St. Louis]] had almost identical problems when it [[Talk:Washington University in St. Louis/GA2|first went to GA]], but the nominator improved the article outside of the GA process, and it passed on it's [[Talk:Washington University in St. Louis/GA3|second attempt]]. |
|||
:::Nice work! You reduced the backlog by one :) I suggest we take on another article which is more likely to pass, so you can get experience evaluating all the criteria. Feel free to pick another if you would like, bearing in mind that nominations by nominators with lots of GAs are more likely to pass. [[User:It is a wonderful world|IAWW]] ([[User talk:It is a wonderful world|talk]]) 10:43, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |