Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-extensive self-consistent thermodynamical theory

Not notable. The article is about a theory proposed in A. Deppman, Physica A 391 (2012) 6380. The article has 66 citations in Google Scholar, and most of those are self-cites. The article was written by [[User:Deppman]]. [[User:Jähmefyysikko|Jähmefyysikko]] ([[User talk:Jähmefyysikko|talk]]) 07:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Not notable. The article is about a theory proposed in A. Deppman, Physica A 391 (2012) 6380. The article has 66 citations in Google Scholar, and most of those are self-cites. The article was written by [[User:Deppman]]. [[User:Jähmefyysikko|Jähmefyysikko]] ([[User talk:Jähmefyysikko|talk]]) 07:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jähmefyysikko|Jähmefyysikko]] ([[User talk:Jähmefyysikko|talk]]) 07:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)</small>

*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jähmefyysikko|Jähmefyysikko]] ([[User talk:Jähmefyysikko|talk]]) 07:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)</small>

*'''Comment''' The exact title "non-extensive self-consistent thermodynamical theory" gets ''zero'' hits on Google Scholar, indicating that it's not even a term that the inventors use. ''If'' we have an article about this, we certainly shouldn't call it that. I agree that the Deppman (2012) paper [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=3227198196241424235&as_sdt=40000005&sciodt=0,22&hl=en doesn't have a very impressive record]: lots of self-citations, and in dubious places like [[MDPI]] journals. There's even a ''[[Chaos, Solitons & Fractals]]'' in there. [[User:Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction|Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction]] ([[User talk:Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction|talk]]) 17:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)