Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Bolaang Mongondow mine collapse - Wikipedia - Recent changes [en]

*:There seems to be a missed element in this appraisal of the AP source. The AP source lists the collapse in a sequence of major collapses, indicating a particularly grievous severity. The commentary is not novel to editors, but present in the source listed above. The discovered sources mentioned in the last continuance seem pretty adequate to separately support notability; I can't see any reason to dismiss them. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 04:38, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

*:There seems to be a missed element in this appraisal of the AP source. The AP source lists the collapse in a sequence of major collapses, indicating a particularly grievous severity. The commentary is not novel to editors, but present in the source listed above. The discovered sources mentioned in the last continuance seem pretty adequate to separately support notability; I can't see any reason to dismiss them. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 04:38, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

*::When you {{tq|imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources}}, that's an OR. [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|c]]) 04:58, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

*::When you {{tq|imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources}}, that's an OR. [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|c]]) 04:58, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

*:::Sure, but I'm not adding commentary to the article. I'm discussing how RSs have presented this and repeatedly indicated there is a particular severity behind this event. It would be OR if I added such commentary to the article, but it's within bounds for an AfD discussion. Again, the other sources do enough lifting that singling out the AP source as though it were the only coverage misses the point in my opinion. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 12:46, 16 July 2025 (UTC)