User talk:UtherSRG

2 weeks ago 440

Question from PAKARMY OFFICIAL (15:42, 4 July 2025): new section

← Previous revision Revision as of 15:42, 4 July 2025
Line 196: Line 196:
:# We should never modify authorities based on a MOS or perception of MOS-related improvements. These are formal pieces of taxonomic data and should be included as used in formal literature. If there are elisions such as et al use in the formal literature, then that's a good indication that we can do so as well.
:# We should never modify authorities based on a MOS or perception of MOS-related improvements. These are formal pieces of taxonomic data and should be included as used in formal literature. If there are elisions such as et al use in the formal literature, then that's a good indication that we can do so as well.
:I hope this helps to clarify. - [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 15:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
:I hope this helps to clarify. - [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 15:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

== Question from [[User:PAKARMY OFFICIAL|PAKARMY OFFICIAL]] (15:42, 4 July 2025) ==

Want to add some Veterans military officials to wikipedia --[[User:PAKARMY OFFICIAL|PAKARMY OFFICIAL]] ([[User talk:PAKARMY OFFICIAL|talk]]) 15:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Open Full Post