User talk:The Kip

:I feel like having retirements and terminations first makes sense at least - thinking from a chronological standpoint, retirements signifies guys taken out of the free agent pool entirely, and terminations signifies guys entering it (in)voluntarily, followed by the general free agency section.

:I feel like having retirements and terminations first makes sense at least - thinking from a chronological standpoint, retirements signifies guys taken out of the free agent pool entirely, and terminations signifies guys entering it (in)voluntarily, followed by the general free agency section.

:No prejudice to swapping around the trades and waivers sections, but it also feels more natural to have the current order given the waivers section is usually shorter. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small>^{([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])}</small></span> 18:20, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

:No prejudice to swapping around the trades and waivers sections, but it also feels more natural to have the current order given the waivers section is usually shorter. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small>^{([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])}</small></span> 18:20, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

::Okay, I see what you are saying! My brain was following similar logic, but I was thinking: 'start with Free Agency as that is, chronologically, the meat and potatoes. Then once free agency slows and we get into the regular season, we see trades, waivers, terminations, and then the bulk of retirements as the year finishes.' –[[User:Uncleben85|uncleben85]] ([[User talk:Uncleben85|<span style="color: green">talk</span>]]) 04:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)