User talk:Editking100

As can be seen here [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shubhanshu_Shukla#Seat_cost]], i have given detailed explanation to the user multiple times regarding the issue and have been supported by other users too. Also i have made 1500+ edits in various pages (including explained 20 edits in this page, which were all kinds of edits including adding sources, fixing spelling and spacing errors and adding wikilinks to name a few). But this is completely opposite for the IP who reported me above, who has edit warred and solely reverted content against consensus (that to only in this page) since the IP id was created a couple of days ago. So i plead NOT-GUILTY here wrt to the information i provided above and also now since the multi-editor content dispute is registered in ANI for this page (so lets wait for admins to settle this issue out there itself). [[User:Editking100|Editking100]] ([[User talk:Editking100#top|talk]]) 18:28, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

As can be seen here [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shubhanshu_Shukla#Seat_cost]], i have given detailed explanation to the user multiple times regarding the issue and have been supported by other users too. Also i have made 1500+ edits in various pages (including explained 20 edits in this page, which were all kinds of edits including adding sources, fixing spelling and spacing errors and adding wikilinks to name a few). But this is completely opposite for the IP who reported me above, who has edit warred and solely reverted content against consensus (that to only in this page) since the IP id was created a couple of days ago. So i plead NOT-GUILTY here wrt to the information i provided above and also now since the multi-editor content dispute is registered in ANI for this page (so lets wait for admins to settle this issue out there itself). [[User:Editking100|Editking100]] ([[User talk:Editking100#top|talk]]) 18:28, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

As you have added the above which is also on the AE page, it seems appropriate to add the response there by an Admin:\

:So, having a look through the provided diffs:

*:Diff 1 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Disney_Star&diff=prev&oldid=1296073629]) is concerning. It is not "racist" to simply state the geolocation of an IP, and that's a serious accusation that should not be made lightly. This appears to be [[WP:ASPERSION|casting aspersions]].

*:Diff 2 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IndiGo&diff=prev&oldid=1296776071]) is indeed inappropriate, as a "citation needed" tag is removed but no citation was added. If that's the only time it happened, I'm willing to presume it was mistake rather than malice, but Editking100 will need to be careful not to do that again. The only time you remove a citation needed tag is if you have actually added a citation that confirms the fact in question, or if you are removing the challenged material as well.

*:Diff 3 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bay_of_Bengal&diff=prev&oldid=1296988498]) is again concerning. When material is challenged as unreferenced, the [[WP:BURDEN|burden]] is on any editor who wishes to restore it to find and cite a source which confirms the challenged material. Editking100 did not do so; they just added the material back, "citation needed" tag and all.

*:Diff 4 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hinduism_in_the_Middle_East&diff=prev&oldid=1296990684]) is a revert of an edit that Editking100 apparently disagrees with, and there was no further edit warring after that. One overlap does not hounding make, either, so I don't see anything actionable here.

*:Diff 5 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shiv_Sena&diff=prev&oldid=1296995263]) was not any kind of edit against consensus, as the cited discussion, first, had a "no consensus" outcome (in the interest of full disclosure, I closed it as such, but I was not a participant nor do I have any opinion regarding it), and secondly, that discussion regarded an article merge, not article editing. One edit is not edit warring. So, again, I don't see anything actionable here.

*:Diff 6 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shubhanshu_Shukla&diff=prev&oldid=1297514989]) could do without the hyperbole, but it's pretty mild as AfD comments I've seen go, and the AfD indeed did close with an overhwelming "Keep" result. I wouldn't sanction based on something like that.

*:Point 7 has no diff link to an on-wiki edit, so I'm not sure what's being claimed here.

*:Diff 8 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shubhanshu_Shukla&diff=prev&oldid=1297525246]) is a discussion of a source; this is a content discussion and not for AE to settle.

:In sum, I think {{u|Editking100}} needs to carefully review the [[WP:V|verifiability]] policy, especially as regards challenged material. If they will agree to do that, I would not impose any sanctions at this time, but I think an informal warning that continued breaches of that policy are grounds for sanction is in order (and if you're going to call someone racist, you better have ''very'' solid evidence for that claim; else knock that off). AE requests are limited to discussion of the filer's and respondent's conduct, so I do not and will not address claims made against any third party here; if anyone thinks it's necessary, file a separate request regarding them. I'll give Editking100 an additional 300 words (above the current 620) for the purpose of replying to this; please keep your response confined to what ''you'' intend to do. Seraphimblade]

[[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 09:28, 5 July 2025 (UTC)