1 week ago
4
Still some issues: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 18:54, 4 July 2025 | ||
| Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
:The issue is currently being addressed in the talk page. Subsequent discussions are ongoing, unfortunately Newsjunkie might still be having some difficulty with Conduct Norms. I’ll back away and take a [[WP:BREAK|Semi-wikibreak]] for now while the issue is being investigated, but Newsjunkie might still be having problems with agreeing with other users. I apologize for disregarding advice but I’m trying to be a good person, and figuring out whether Newsjunkie is improving. [[User:NacreousPuma855|NacreousPuma855]] ([[User talk:NacreousPuma855|talk]]) 05:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC) |
:The issue is currently being addressed in the talk page. Subsequent discussions are ongoing, unfortunately Newsjunkie might still be having some difficulty with Conduct Norms. I’ll back away and take a [[WP:BREAK|Semi-wikibreak]] for now while the issue is being investigated, but Newsjunkie might still be having problems with agreeing with other users. I apologize for disregarding advice but I’m trying to be a good person, and figuring out whether Newsjunkie is improving. [[User:NacreousPuma855|NacreousPuma855]] ([[User talk:NacreousPuma855|talk]]) 05:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
::@[[User:NacreousPuma855|NacreousPuma855]] It is not your job to police newsjunkie. And even if it was, I really don't see how the edit you reverted was problematic, or somehow evidence of her not agreeing with others. She's been quite collegial about it as far as I can see. There are so many other things to do on Wiki; stop following her around and focus on editing what you want to edit. [[User:CaptainEek|<b style="color:#6a1f7f">CaptainEek</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:CaptainEek|<i style="font-size:82%; color:#a479e5">Edits Ho Cap'n!</i>]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/CaptainEek|⚓]] 07:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC) |
::@[[User:NacreousPuma855|NacreousPuma855]] It is not your job to police newsjunkie. And even if it was, I really don't see how the edit you reverted was problematic, or somehow evidence of her not agreeing with others. She's been quite collegial about it as far as I can see. There are so many other things to do on Wiki; stop following her around and focus on editing what you want to edit. [[User:CaptainEek|<b style="color:#6a1f7f">CaptainEek</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:CaptainEek|<i style="font-size:82%; color:#a479e5">Edits Ho Cap'n!</i>]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/CaptainEek|⚓]] 07:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
:::It’s not Newsjunkie’s job either to add irrelevant content that other users disagree with. Have you even read the article’s talk page? Most people are disagreeing with Newsjunkie’s edits. Why are you being rude to an autistic individual who is reverted changes from a known disruptive user, and defend a user who has had behavioral problems and 4 ANI reports? I do focus on editing what I want to edit, Newsjunkie hasn’t edited the pages before either. Am I being threatened with a block? Absolutely not. [[User:NacreousPuma855|NacreousPuma855]] ([[User talk:NacreousPuma855|talk]]) 18:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== Question from [[User:Jehanxaib|Jehanxaib]] (06:32, 4 July 2025) == |
== Question from [[User:Jehanxaib|Jehanxaib]] (06:32, 4 July 2025) == |
||
