Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tenshi Hinanawi
  • Start date Start date
T

Tenshi Hinanawi

Guest
Filed a complaint against NeoGaze: Reply

Line 695:Line 695:
[td]
← Previous revision
[/td]
[td]
Revision as of 23:17, 2 September 2025
[/td]
[td]:Why on earth are you trusting a [[Knowledge Panel]]-esque AI tool and blaming us for said tool that we have zero control over? β€”[[User:JΓ©skΓ© Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">JΓ©skΓ© Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:JΓ©skΓ© Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:JΓ©skΓ© Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:JΓ©skΓ© Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 22:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:Why on earth are you trusting a [[Knowledge Panel]]-esque AI tool and blaming us for said tool that we have zero control over? β€”[[User:JΓ©skΓ© Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">JΓ©skΓ© Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:JΓ©skΓ© Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:JΓ©skΓ© Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:JΓ©skΓ© Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 22:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::Because your security is ?? All over the Internet you promoted AI tech companies from San Francisco now you are changing your tune all of a sudden because it no longer serves your purpose. When you are being caught as a listed source and now you are trying to clean up your mess that you created. Yes, I do blame Wikipedia like I said if you do not like someone with different views conservative than perhaps you should stop trying to pursue conflict. The fact of the matter is I have 155 Copyrights world wide with 15 plus trademarks some listed with the WIPO and it must really bother you so much.I haver also told wikipedia a few months ago that since you delete all of my pages I must demand that you have no more access into my copyrights based on Science and Technology and of course you dismissed this. [[User:Bcrouse2025g|Barry Lee Crouse]] ([[User talk:Bcrouse2025g|talk]]) 23:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::Because your security is ?? All over the Internet you promoted AI tech companies from San Francisco now you are changing your tune all of a sudden because it no longer serves your purpose. When you are being caught as a listed source and now you are trying to clean up your mess that you created. Yes, I do blame Wikipedia like I said if you do not like someone with different views conservative than perhaps you should stop trying to pursue conflict. The fact of the matter is I have 155 Copyrights world wide with 15 plus trademarks some listed with the WIPO and it must really bother you so much.I haver also told wikipedia a few months ago that since you delete all of my pages I must demand that you have no more access into my copyrights based on Science and Technology and of course you dismissed this. [[User:Bcrouse2025g|Barry Lee Crouse]] ([[User talk:Bcrouse2025g|talk]]) 23:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:::We are only volunteers, we have no control over what search engines promote. Whether you have 155 copyrights and 15 trademarks is irrelevant. What actual problem do you have with NeoGaze and their review of your draft?[/td] [td]:@[[User:Bcrouse2025g|Bcrouse2025g]] Wikipedia, as far as I know, has not actively approached third party sites like DuckDuckGo or Google to use Wikipedia as a source. If Wikipedia is a source, it is that platform's response that you are seeking. I have gone through the draft you have created and the responses that @[[User:NeoGaze|NeoGaze]] had given to you on your talk page. First, the draft is sorely lacking as explained by NeoGaze. Please improve the draft as indicated by NeoGaze. Third party platforms use Wikipedia as a source partly is because the notability standards that we have for inclusion of new content. We will not lower the standards just at your say-so. Adhere to it, and we will have next to no issue with you. No freedom of speech is impacted here. You are free to say or do whatever you want, as long as you adhere to the rules of the house. If anything NeoGaze had not asked for outright deletion of the content yet, which in almost many other instances would be requested speedily for and deleted accordingly. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 23:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:@[[User:Bcrouse2025g|Bcrouse2025g]] Wikipedia, as far as I know, has not actively approached third party sites like DuckDuckGo or Google to use Wikipedia as a source. If Wikipedia is a source, it is that platform's response that you are seeking. I have gone through the draft you have created and the responses that @[[User:NeoGaze|NeoGaze]] had given to you on your talk page. First, the draft is sorely lacking as explained by NeoGaze. Please improve the draft as indicated by NeoGaze. Third party platforms use Wikipedia as a source partly is because the notability standards that we have for inclusion of new content. We will not lower the standards just at your say-so. Adhere to it, and we will have next to no issue with you. No freedom of speech is impacted here. You are free to say or do whatever you want, as long as you adhere to the rules of the house. If anything NeoGaze had not asked for outright deletion of the content yet, which in almost many other instances would be requested speedily for and deleted accordingly. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 23:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]

Continue reading...
 


Join 𝕋𝕄𝕋 on Telegram
Channel PREVIEW:
Back
Top