Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orbitalbuzzsaw
  • Start date Start date
O

Orbitalbuzzsaw

Guest
(Posted as blurb) RD/Blurb: Giorgio Armani: Reply

Line 119:Line 119:
[td]
← Previous revision
[/td]
[td]
Revision as of 06:19, 5 September 2025
[/td]
[td]*::If a death is not notable enough for its own article, it's (generally) not notable enough for ITN. Old man dies, and all. Some deaths are worth posting because of their direct effect - those of serving heads of state, or assassinations. Occasionally, very occasionally, you can justify one for a private citizen or retired politician. But a fashion designer? It might be news in Italy, but certainly not globally. [[User:Orbitalbuzzsaw|This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang]] ([[User talk:Orbitalbuzzsaw|talk]]) 06:17, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*::If a death is not notable enough for its own article, it's (generally) not notable enough for ITN. Old man dies, and all. Some deaths are worth posting because of their direct effect - those of serving heads of state, or assassinations. Occasionally, very occasionally, you can justify one for a private citizen or retired politician. But a fashion designer? It might be news in Italy, but certainly not globally. [[User:Orbitalbuzzsaw|This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang]] ([[User talk:Orbitalbuzzsaw|talk]]) 06:17, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*:There is zero requirement for a separate death article, and it can be disruptive to keep trying to insist there such a requirement when that is not at all among the guidelines. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 05:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*:There is zero requirement for a separate death article, and it can be disruptive to keep trying to insist there such a requirement when that is not at all among the guidelines. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 05:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*::It's not an absolute requirement, but I would say that it's a good first-order test of whether someone is notable enough for a death blurb. As you well know, I think ITN is far too liberal with them, partially because "impact on a field" is an infinitely movable goalpost and also because of topic provincialism (no matter how revolutionary an underwater basket-weaver you were, that's just not a world-changing life story) [[User:Orbitalbuzzsaw|This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang]] ([[User talk:Orbitalbuzzsaw|talk]]) 06:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td][/td]
[td][/td]
[td]==== (Closed) Streameast ====[/td]
[td]==== (Closed) Streameast ====[/td]

Continue reading...
 


Join 𝕋𝕄𝕋 on Telegram
Channel PREVIEW:
Back
Top