U
UnpetitproleX
Guest
Pajeet: Reply
[td]::::::{{re|ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·}} Of course, but those desriptions cannot be denuded of their context with which they appear in the source used, as I note above ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...eories/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1308989036 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...eories/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1308991731 here]). [[User:UnpetitproleX|UnpetitproleX]] ([[User talk:UnpetitproleX|talk]]) 16:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]:::::::Context is surely important. Do you have interlocutors who are arguing otherwise? [[User:ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·|jps]] ([[User talk:ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·|talk]]) 17:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:::::::Context is surely important. Do you have interlocutors who are arguing otherwise? [[User:ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·|jps]] ([[User talk:ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·|talk]]) 17:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]::::::::On the talk page we have some South Asian editors who are arguing that we should limit the targets of the slur to those understood by them to be the targets (specific South Asian groups) in contravention of what sources say (all South Asians in general, specific ones when slur used by other South Asians against each other), so yes, we do have commentors wishing to kill the context. [[User:UnpetitproleX|UnpetitproleX]] ([[User talk:UnpetitproleX|talk]]) 23:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
| Line 378: | Line 378: |
[td]
β Previous revision
[/td][td]
[td]::::::{{re|ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·}} Of course, but those desriptions cannot be denuded of their context with which they appear in the source used, as I note above ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...eories/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1308989036 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...eories/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1308991731 here]). [[User:UnpetitproleX|UnpetitproleX]] ([[User talk:UnpetitproleX|talk]]) 16:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]Revision as of 23:17, 2 September 2025
[/td][td]::::::{{re|ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·}} Of course, but those desriptions cannot be denuded of their context with which they appear in the source used, as I note above ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...eories/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1308989036 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...eories/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1308991731 here]). [[User:UnpetitproleX|UnpetitproleX]] ([[User talk:UnpetitproleX|talk]]) 16:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]:::::::Context is surely important. Do you have interlocutors who are arguing otherwise? [[User:ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·|jps]] ([[User talk:ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·|talk]]) 17:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:::::::Context is surely important. Do you have interlocutors who are arguing otherwise? [[User:ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·|jps]] ([[User talk:ΰΆ’ΰΆ΄ΰ·|talk]]) 17:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]::::::::On the talk page we have some South Asian editors who are arguing that we should limit the targets of the slur to those understood by them to be the targets (specific South Asian groups) in contravention of what sources say (all South Asians in general, specific ones when slur used by other South Asians against each other), so yes, we do have commentors wishing to kill the context. [[User:UnpetitproleX|UnpetitproleX]] ([[User talk:UnpetitproleX|talk]]) 23:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
