L
Local Variable
Guest
John Fraser (Canadian soccer): ce
[td]* '''Overturn to delete''' the keep !votes proceeded on two fundamental misunderstandings as identified and should have been discounted. That being so, there was consensus to delete. I'm not convinced the ATDs were well explained either. There's basically nothing to merge, and those calling for a merge don't identify what it is that should be merged that isn't already listed at the target. [[User:Local Variable|Local Variable]] ([[User talk:Local Variable|talk]]) 01:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]*:How do you reason there is consensus to delete rather than redirect? [[User:Ike Lek|Ike Lek]] ([[User talk:Ike Lek|talk]]) 02:18, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*:How do you reason there is consensus to delete rather than redirect? [[User:Ike Lek|Ike Lek]] ([[User talk:Ike Lek|talk]]) 02:18, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]*::It's inherent in the conclusion the subject is notable, and so it's an implausible redirect - matters raised in the AfD with no convincing response except an unconvincing reference to a hit counter. But that may have been an open outcome to the closer as an ATD, and I wouldn't stand in the way of a DRV close as a redirect, if that's consensus here. [[User:Local Variable|Local Variable]] ([[User talk:Local Variable|talk]]) 03:06, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*::It's inherent in the conclusion the subject is notable, and so it's an implausible redirect - matters raised in the AfD with no convincing response except a reference to a hit counter. But that may have been an open outcome to the closer as an ATD, and I wouldn't stand in the way of a DRV close as a redirect, if that's consensus here. [[User:Local Variable|Local Variable]] ([[User talk:Local Variable|talk]]) 03:06, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]*'''Overturn to delete''' (involved) - Keep arguments based on NOLY shouldnβt have been weighted, since NOLY explicitly excludes medals that were granted automatically simply for participating.[/td]
[td]*'''Overturn to delete''' (involved) - Keep arguments based on NOLY shouldnβt have been weighted, since NOLY explicitly excludes medals that were granted automatically simply for participating.[/td] [td]:Also: How on earth is any closer saying that {{tq|βAs is noted at the top of the page and in my talk page edit notice, I carefully consider all deletion decisions before closing and do not reconsider them based on talk page requestsβ}}? To force every discussion about an AFD close, regardless of merit, in to DELREV is simply unreasonable. [[User:FOARP|FOARP]] ([[User talk:FOARP|talk]]) 03:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:Also: How on earth is any closer saying that {{tq|βAs is noted at the top of the page and in my talk page edit notice, I carefully consider all deletion decisions before closing and do not reconsider them based on talk page requestsβ}}? To force every discussion about an AFD close, regardless of merit, in to DELREV is simply unreasonable. [[User:FOARP|FOARP]] ([[User talk:FOARP|talk]]) 03:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
| Line 18: | Line 18: |
[td]
β Previous revision
[/td][td]
[td]* '''Overturn to delete''' the keep !votes proceeded on two fundamental misunderstandings as identified and should have been discounted. That being so, there was consensus to delete. I'm not convinced the ATDs were well explained either. There's basically nothing to merge, and those calling for a merge don't identify what it is that should be merged that isn't already listed at the target. [[User:Local Variable|Local Variable]] ([[User talk:Local Variable|talk]]) 01:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]Revision as of 03:09, 31 August 2025
[/td][td]* '''Overturn to delete''' the keep !votes proceeded on two fundamental misunderstandings as identified and should have been discounted. That being so, there was consensus to delete. I'm not convinced the ATDs were well explained either. There's basically nothing to merge, and those calling for a merge don't identify what it is that should be merged that isn't already listed at the target. [[User:Local Variable|Local Variable]] ([[User talk:Local Variable|talk]]) 01:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]*:How do you reason there is consensus to delete rather than redirect? [[User:Ike Lek|Ike Lek]] ([[User talk:Ike Lek|talk]]) 02:18, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*:How do you reason there is consensus to delete rather than redirect? [[User:Ike Lek|Ike Lek]] ([[User talk:Ike Lek|talk]]) 02:18, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]*::It's inherent in the conclusion the subject is notable, and so it's an implausible redirect - matters raised in the AfD with no convincing response except an unconvincing reference to a hit counter. But that may have been an open outcome to the closer as an ATD, and I wouldn't stand in the way of a DRV close as a redirect, if that's consensus here. [[User:Local Variable|Local Variable]] ([[User talk:Local Variable|talk]]) 03:06, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*::It's inherent in the conclusion the subject is notable, and so it's an implausible redirect - matters raised in the AfD with no convincing response except a reference to a hit counter. But that may have been an open outcome to the closer as an ATD, and I wouldn't stand in the way of a DRV close as a redirect, if that's consensus here. [[User:Local Variable|Local Variable]] ([[User talk:Local Variable|talk]]) 03:06, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]*'''Overturn to delete''' (involved) - Keep arguments based on NOLY shouldnβt have been weighted, since NOLY explicitly excludes medals that were granted automatically simply for participating.[/td]
[td]*'''Overturn to delete''' (involved) - Keep arguments based on NOLY shouldnβt have been weighted, since NOLY explicitly excludes medals that were granted automatically simply for participating.[/td] [td]:Also: How on earth is any closer saying that {{tq|βAs is noted at the top of the page and in my talk page edit notice, I carefully consider all deletion decisions before closing and do not reconsider them based on talk page requestsβ}}? To force every discussion about an AFD close, regardless of merit, in to DELREV is simply unreasonable. [[User:FOARP|FOARP]] ([[User talk:FOARP|talk]]) 03:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:Also: How on earth is any closer saying that {{tq|βAs is noted at the top of the page and in my talk page edit notice, I carefully consider all deletion decisions before closing and do not reconsider them based on talk page requestsβ}}? To force every discussion about an AFD close, regardless of merit, in to DELREV is simply unreasonable. [[User:FOARP|FOARP]] ([[User talk:FOARP|talk]]) 03:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
