Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now Playing (magazine)

K

Kvng

Guest
add link

Line 18:Line 18:
[td]
← Previous revision
[/td]
[td]
Revision as of 22:10, 2 September 2025
[/td]
[td]*::Per [[WP:PRIMARY]], primary sources can be used to cite simple statements of facts. An example on that policy page includes an artist's discography, this list of published magazines is similar. --[[User:Mika1h|Mika1h]] ([[User talk:Mika1h|talk]]) 21:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*::Per [[WP:PRIMARY]], primary sources can be used to cite simple statements of facts. An example on that policy page includes an artist's discography, this list of published magazines is similar. --[[User:Mika1h|Mika1h]] ([[User talk:Mika1h|talk]]) 21:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*:::Ok, but is that enough to justify a redirect? WP is not a database. The more significant [[Computer Games Magazine]] already has a detailed article, so the relevance of this magazine looks rather low. [[User:IgelRM|IgelRM]] ([[User talk:IgelRM|talk]]) 19:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*:::Ok, but is that enough to justify a redirect? WP is not a database. The more significant [[Computer Games Magazine]] already has a detailed article, so the relevance of this magazine looks rather low. [[User:IgelRM|IgelRM]] ([[User talk:IgelRM|talk]]) 19:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*::::Notability standards do not apply to redirects. The more appropriate question is whether a redirect is helpful (or hurtful) to readers. We generally lean towards retaining them ([[WP:CHEAP]]). ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 22:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*::::Notability standards do not apply to redirects. The more appropriate question is whether a redirect is helpful (or [[WP:COSTLY|hurtful]]) to readers. We generally lean towards retaining them ([[WP:CHEAP]]). ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 22:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]

Continue reading...
 


Join 𝕋𝕄𝕋 on Telegram
Channel PREVIEW:
Back
Top