Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hong Kong post offices

J

JMWt

Guest
List of Hong Kong post offices: Reply

Line 196:Line 196:
[td]
← Previous revision
[/td]
[td]
Revision as of 07:34, 2 September 2025
[/td]
[td]*:::::I know you disagree in good faith, but I suggest you've made a weak defence for keeping a list of objects which would be best held at wikidata.[/td]
[td]*:::::I know you disagree in good faith, but I suggest you've made a weak defence for keeping a list of objects which would be best held at wikidata.[/td]
[td]*:::::All the best. [[User:JMWt|JMWt]] ([[User talk:JMWt|talk]]) 04:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*:::::All the best. [[User:JMWt|JMWt]] ([[User talk:JMWt|talk]]) 04:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]*::::::Also I forgot to say that there is something about the ''status'' of a particular physical object. A post office only has status because of its function, whereas (in my example above) Grade 1 historical buildings have status due to their age/recognition [[User:JMWt|JMWt]] ([[User talk:JMWt|talk]]) 07:34, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[/td]

Continue reading...
 


Join 𝕋𝕄𝕋 on Telegram
Channel PREVIEW:
Back
Top