E
Extraordinary Writ
Guest
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)
[td][/td] [td]<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>[/td]
[td]<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>[/td] [td]:{{la|1=Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}} β (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 August 25#{{anchorencode:Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special
iff/1306587561/cur|edits since nomination]])[/td]
[td]:{{la|1=Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}} β (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 September 3#{{anchorencode:Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Specialiff/1306587561/cur|edits since nomination]])[/td]
[td]
{{Find sources AFD|title=Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}})[/td]
[td]{{Find sources AFD|title=Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}})[/td]
[td]Almost totally unreferenced article about a school for which notability is not shown, nor found prior to nomination. Fails [[WP:NSCHOOL]]. [[Userorsetonian|Dorsetonian]] ([[User talkorsetonian|talk]]) 16:05, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]Almost totally unreferenced article about a school for which notability is not shown, nor found prior to nomination. Fails [[WP:NSCHOOL]]. [[Userorsetonian|Dorsetonian]] ([[User talkorsetonian|talk]]) 16:05, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::::I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. However, separate from this conversation, insisting on published histories of schools or independent analyses of a school's work would impose a much higher standard than has been in place before, and I'd suggest a Village Pump conversation for that interpretation of SIGCOV rather than introducing it in an individual AfD. [[Userclemens1971|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talkclemens1971|talk]]) 22:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::::I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. However, separate from this conversation, insisting on published histories of schools or independent analyses of a school's work would impose a much higher standard than has been in place before, and I'd suggest a Village Pump conversation for that interpretation of SIGCOV rather than introducing it in an individual AfD. [[Userclemens1971|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talkclemens1971|talk]]) 22:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::::
{{u|Dclemens1971}} I don't see the need to take this elsewhere because I don't perceive this as a novel interpretation but a faithful interpretation of [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:SYNTH]] policy. To put it simply, we need sources directly about the topic in evidence. If the topic is Harvard University the sources need to be about the university as a whole. If all we had were sources about Harvard's biology and chemistry programs we couldn't build an article about the entire university just based off of those. The same principle applies here. "Directly and in detail about Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology" means just that. There needs to be sources which address the main topic directly not just a small aspect of the main topic.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 23:03, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::::{{u|Dclemens1971}} I don't see the need to take this elsewhere because I don't perceive this as a novel interpretation but a faithful interpretation of [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:SYNTH]] policy. To put it simply, we need sources directly about the topic in evidence. If the topic is Harvard University the sources need to be about the university as a whole. If all we had were sources about Harvard's biology and chemistry programs we couldn't build an article about the entire university just based off of those. The same principle applies here. "Directly and in detail about Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology" means just that. There needs to be sources which address the main topic directly not just a small aspect of the main topic.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 23:03, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:<div class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipediaeletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 01:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology]]</noinclude></div>[/td]
Continue reading...
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| Line 18: | Line 18: |
[td]
β Previous revision
[/td][td]
[td][/td]Revision as of 01:00, 3 September 2025
[/td][td][/td] [td]<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>[/td]
[td]<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>[/td] [td]:{{la|1=Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}} β (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 August 25#{{anchorencode:Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special
iff/1306587561/cur|edits since nomination]])[/td][td]:{{la|1=Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}} β (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 September 3#{{anchorencode:Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special
iff/1306587561/cur|edits since nomination]])[/td]
[td]{{Find sources AFD|title=Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}})[/td][td]
{{Find sources AFD|title=Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology}})[/td]
[td]Almost totally unreferenced article about a school for which notability is not shown, nor found prior to nomination. Fails [[WP:NSCHOOL]]. [[Userorsetonian|Dorsetonian]] ([[User talkorsetonian|talk]]) 16:05, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[/td][td]Almost totally unreferenced article about a school for which notability is not shown, nor found prior to nomination. Fails [[WP:NSCHOOL]]. [[User
orsetonian|Dorsetonian]] ([[User talkorsetonian|talk]]) 16:05, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::::I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. However, separate from this conversation, insisting on published histories of schools or independent analyses of a school's work would impose a much higher standard than has been in place before, and I'd suggest a Village Pump conversation for that interpretation of SIGCOV rather than introducing it in an individual AfD. [[Userclemens1971|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talkclemens1971|talk]]) 22:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[/td][td]::::I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. However, separate from this conversation, insisting on published histories of schools or independent analyses of a school's work would impose a much higher standard than has been in place before, and I'd suggest a Village Pump conversation for that interpretation of SIGCOV rather than introducing it in an individual AfD. [[User
clemens1971|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talkclemens1971|talk]]) 22:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::::{{u|Dclemens1971}} I don't see the need to take this elsewhere because I don't perceive this as a novel interpretation but a faithful interpretation of [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:SYNTH]] policy. To put it simply, we need sources directly about the topic in evidence. If the topic is Harvard University the sources need to be about the university as a whole. If all we had were sources about Harvard's biology and chemistry programs we couldn't build an article about the entire university just based off of those. The same principle applies here. "Directly and in detail about Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology" means just that. There needs to be sources which address the main topic directly not just a small aspect of the main topic.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 23:03, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[/td][td]::::
{{u|Dclemens1971}} I don't see the need to take this elsewhere because I don't perceive this as a novel interpretation but a faithful interpretation of [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:SYNTH]] policy. To put it simply, we need sources directly about the topic in evidence. If the topic is Harvard University the sources need to be about the university as a whole. If all we had were sources about Harvard's biology and chemistry programs we couldn't build an article about the entire university just based off of those. The same principle applies here. "Directly and in detail about Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology" means just that. There needs to be sources which address the main topic directly not just a small aspect of the main topic.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 23:03, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:<div class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipediaeletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 01:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Academy of Arts, Careers and Technology]]</noinclude></div>[/td]Continue reading...
