F
Farkle Griffen
Guest
User:Farkle Griffen reported by User
.Lazard (Result: ): Reply
[td]# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Function_(mathematics)&diff=next&oldid=1308797679][/td] [td]I must apologize to have reverted this user four times. Also, I did not open a discussion on the talk page. Nevertheless, it is clear from edit summaries that this user considers that, in case of disagreement, this is their version that should prevails, and that they have not to explain the motivations of their change. [[User.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk.Lazard|talk]]) 16:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]I must apologize to have reverted this user four times. Also, I did not open a discussion on the talk page. Nevertheless, it is clear from edit summaries that this user considers that, in case of disagreement, this is their version that should prevails, and that they have not to explain the motivations of their change. [[User.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk.Lazard|talk]]) 16:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td][/td]
[td]:All I asked was that you give more explanation than vague replies like "confusing" or "no consenus". I did attempt to explain my reasoning: the previous version does not explain how to go from the set-theoretic definition of "function" as a relation <math>(x,y)\in f</math> to the more common <math>f(x) = y.</math> I was very clear that I am happy to fix it, if I could only understand your issue with it. <span class="nowrap">β [[User:Farkle Griffen|Farkle Griffen]] ([[User talk:Farkle Griffen|talk]])</span> 16:40, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
.Lazard (Result: ): Reply| Line 310: | Line 310: |
[td]
β Previous revision
[/td][td]
[td]# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Function_(mathematics)&diff=next&oldid=1308797679][/td]Revision as of 16:40, 31 August 2025
[/td][td]# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Function_(mathematics)&diff=next&oldid=1308797679][/td] [td]I must apologize to have reverted this user four times. Also, I did not open a discussion on the talk page. Nevertheless, it is clear from edit summaries that this user considers that, in case of disagreement, this is their version that should prevails, and that they have not to explain the motivations of their change. [[User
.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk.Lazard|talk]]) 16:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td][td]I must apologize to have reverted this user four times. Also, I did not open a discussion on the talk page. Nevertheless, it is clear from edit summaries that this user considers that, in case of disagreement, this is their version that should prevails, and that they have not to explain the motivations of their change. [[User
.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk.Lazard|talk]]) 16:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td][/td]
[td]:All I asked was that you give more explanation than vague replies like "confusing" or "no consenus". I did attempt to explain my reasoning: the previous version does not explain how to go from the set-theoretic definition of "function" as a relation <math>(x,y)\in f</math> to the more common <math>f(x) = y.</math> I was very clear that I am happy to fix it, if I could only understand your issue with it. <span class="nowrap">β [[User:Farkle Griffen|Farkle Griffen]] ([[User talk:Farkle Griffen|talk]])</span> 16:40, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]Continue reading...
