E
EuhoricAussie
Guest
Reply
[td]:" It is absolutely not advertising and you are manufacturing. Blaming innocent people without any evidence is a crime and I believe you know that. Wikipedia is not not owned by you and you cannot patronize and bully others like this. If techcrunch article is fine in this post why not official medium.com one is not? What is wrong with the pen name of of the contributor? Did the word Illumination disturb you? Or are you against the word editors? Show us where it says this name can't be used, mate. You are acting like a bully and it is not acceptable in a public community. We are all equal here. Being an administrator does not give you the right to be unfair and bully others. I hope Wikipedia address this unfair situation before its reputation get further dented. [[User:EuhoricAussie|EuhoricAussie]] ([[User talk:EuhoricAussie|talk]]) 11:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]::If this user wants to be unblocked, they can follow the steps indicated in the block notice. I've also left a message on your talk page. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]''' '''[[User talk:Salvio giuliano|<sup>giuliano</sup>]]'''</span> 11:09, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::If this user wants to be unblocked, they can follow the steps indicated in the block notice. I've also left a message on your talk page. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]''' '''[[User talk:Salvio giuliano|<sup>giuliano</sup>]]'''</span> 11:09, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]:::I know the user and they are not computer wiz to understand the mambo jumbo here. I advised them to appeal and they confirmed that they did. It was a storm in teacup and unnecessary stress to contributors. Thanks for conversing at least and hope you understand your mistake, apologize, and get their appeal accepted. I hope you do not jump to conclusions without any evidence like this example before checking the official links provided in the accurate statement. The contributor here has nothing to do with any commercial organization. They are retired scientists like myself. [[User:EuhoricAussie|EuhoricAussie]] ([[User talk:EuhoricAussie|talk]]) 11:24, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
| Line 18: | Line 18: |
[td]
β Previous revision
[/td][td]
[td]:" It is absolutely not advertising and you are manufacturing. Blaming innocent people without any evidence is a crime and I believe you know that. Wikipedia is not not owned by you and you cannot patronize and bully others like this. If techcrunch article is fine in this post why not official medium.com one is not? What is wrong with the pen name of of the contributor? Did the word Illumination disturb you? Or are you against the word editors? Show us where it says this name can't be used, mate. You are acting like a bully and it is not acceptable in a public community. We are all equal here. Being an administrator does not give you the right to be unfair and bully others. I hope Wikipedia address this unfair situation before its reputation get further dented. [[User:EuhoricAussie|EuhoricAussie]] ([[User talk:EuhoricAussie|talk]]) 11:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]Revision as of 11:24, 31 August 2025
[/td][td]:" It is absolutely not advertising and you are manufacturing. Blaming innocent people without any evidence is a crime and I believe you know that. Wikipedia is not not owned by you and you cannot patronize and bully others like this. If techcrunch article is fine in this post why not official medium.com one is not? What is wrong with the pen name of of the contributor? Did the word Illumination disturb you? Or are you against the word editors? Show us where it says this name can't be used, mate. You are acting like a bully and it is not acceptable in a public community. We are all equal here. Being an administrator does not give you the right to be unfair and bully others. I hope Wikipedia address this unfair situation before its reputation get further dented. [[User:EuhoricAussie|EuhoricAussie]] ([[User talk:EuhoricAussie|talk]]) 11:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]::If this user wants to be unblocked, they can follow the steps indicated in the block notice. I've also left a message on your talk page. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]''' '''[[User talk:Salvio giuliano|<sup>giuliano</sup>]]'''</span> 11:09, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]::If this user wants to be unblocked, they can follow the steps indicated in the block notice. I've also left a message on your talk page. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]''' '''[[User talk:Salvio giuliano|<sup>giuliano</sup>]]'''</span> 11:09, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]:::I know the user and they are not computer wiz to understand the mambo jumbo here. I advised them to appeal and they confirmed that they did. It was a storm in teacup and unnecessary stress to contributors. Thanks for conversing at least and hope you understand your mistake, apologize, and get their appeal accepted. I hope you do not jump to conclusions without any evidence like this example before checking the official links provided in the accurate statement. The contributor here has nothing to do with any commercial organization. They are retired scientists like myself. [[User:EuhoricAussie|EuhoricAussie]] ([[User talk:EuhoricAussie|talk]]) 11:24, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
