S
Srleffler
Guest
Refbomb: Replacing reliable sources with an unreliable one is not a good edit.
[td][/td] [td][[User
olygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talkolygnotus|talk]]) 23:35, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td][[Userolygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talkolygnotus|talk]]) 23:35, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:I reverted you for the moment. We probably don't need six references, but replacing six references most of which are to reliable sources with one reference to an unreliable source is not a good edit, particularly since the site in question raises a security alert. I'm happy to discuss which of the six references might be the best one(s) to keep, but we can keep the status quo while we discuss that. Having too many references is not a crisis.--[[User:Srleffler|Srleffler]] ([[User talk:Srleffler|talk]]) 06:29, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
| Line 208: | Line 208: |
[td]
β Previous revision
[/td][td]
[td][/td]Revision as of 06:29, 30 August 2025
[/td][td][/td] [td][[User
olygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talkolygnotus|talk]]) 23:35, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[/td][td][[User
olygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talkolygnotus|talk]]) 23:35, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:I reverted you for the moment. We probably don't need six references, but replacing six references most of which are to reliable sources with one reference to an unreliable source is not a good edit, particularly since the site in question raises a security alert. I'm happy to discuss which of the six references might be the best one(s) to keep, but we can keep the status quo while we discuss that. Having too many references is not a crisis.--[[User:Srleffler|Srleffler]] ([[User talk:Srleffler|talk]]) 06:29, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]Continue reading...
