S
Sakuav
Guest
"state owned": Reply
[td]:Well I own some Intel stock; so I guess it's O3000 owned. I definitely think this should be mentioned in one of the Trump articles, but not here. [[User:Objective3000|O3000, Ret.]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 16:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]:I've removed it from the lead and have clarified in the infobox reflecting the content in the body which says the government has zero board representation or governance rights. Calling that state-owned is misleading. In any case, if the content needs to be re-introduced, seek consensus first. [[User
trnext|Ptrnext]] ([[User talktrnext|talk]]) 01:04, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:I've removed it from the lead and have clarified in the infobox reflecting the content in the body which says the government has zero board representation or governance rights. Calling that state-owned is misleading. In any case, if the content needs to be re-introduced, seek consensus first. [[Usertrnext|Ptrnext]] ([[User talktrnext|talk]]) 01:04, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:I disagree with removing this from the lead. A 9.9% direct government stake is substantial and meets standard definitions of partial state ownership - the lack of board representation doesnβt negate the ownership itself. This is material information that readers would reasonably expect to find in the lead, and removing it creates a misleading impression by obscuring a significant aspect of Intelβs ownership structure. A brief, factual mention in the lead (e.g., βpartially stated-owned companyβ) while keeping the detailed explanation in the body is consistent with other articles. [[User:Sakuav|Sakuav]] ([[User talk:Sakuav|talk]]) 11:25, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
| Line 77: | Line 77: |
[td]
β Previous revision
[/td][td]
[td]:Well I own some Intel stock; so I guess it's O3000 owned. I definitely think this should be mentioned in one of the Trump articles, but not here. [[User:Objective3000|O3000, Ret.]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 16:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]Revision as of 11:25, 30 August 2025
[/td][td]:Well I own some Intel stock; so I guess it's O3000 owned. I definitely think this should be mentioned in one of the Trump articles, but not here. [[User:Objective3000|O3000, Ret.]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 16:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[/td] [td]:I've removed it from the lead and have clarified in the infobox reflecting the content in the body which says the government has zero board representation or governance rights. Calling that state-owned is misleading. In any case, if the content needs to be re-introduced, seek consensus first. [[User
trnext|Ptrnext]] ([[User talktrnext|talk]]) 01:04, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td][td]:I've removed it from the lead and have clarified in the infobox reflecting the content in the body which says the government has zero board representation or governance rights. Calling that state-owned is misleading. In any case, if the content needs to be re-introduced, seek consensus first. [[User
trnext|Ptrnext]] ([[User talktrnext|talk]]) 01:04, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:I disagree with removing this from the lead. A 9.9% direct government stake is substantial and meets standard definitions of partial state ownership - the lack of board representation doesnβt negate the ownership itself. This is material information that readers would reasonably expect to find in the lead, and removing it creates a misleading impression by obscuring a significant aspect of Intelβs ownership structure. A brief, factual mention in the lead (e.g., βpartially stated-owned companyβ) while keeping the detailed explanation in the body is consistent with other articles. [[User:Sakuav|Sakuav]] ([[User talk:Sakuav|talk]]) 11:25, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]Continue reading...
