H
Hmmmnnn
Guest
Alignment with ACT Party
[td]:::* If you are concerned about words like 'however', you could remove that word rather than delete the entire paragraph.[/td] [td]:::* You express concern about a 'free to use news platform.' Wikipedia is also a free use platform so that seems a very strange concern.[/td]
[td]:::* You express concern about a 'free to use news platform.' Wikipedia is also a free use platform so that seems a very strange concern.[/td] [td]:::* You then say the information on that platform (that Hobson's Pledge members supported the Treaty Principles Bill) is "not attributed to anyone", and that therefore it is not a reliable source. Here's another source that says "the conservative lobby group Hobsonβs Pledge submitted [on the Bill] with 24,706 signatories".[/td]
[td]:::* You then say the information on that platform (that Hobson's Pledge members supported the Treaty Principles Bill) is "not attributed to anyone", and that therefore it is not a reliable source. Here's another source that says "the conservative lobby group Hobsonβs Pledge submitted [on the Bill] with 24,706 signatories". So that negates your concern about that particular source.[/td] [td]:::* You also express concern about the source from RNZ, and seem to suggest there is a problem becasue the two sources are nine years apart. So what? What's your concern about that?[/td] [td][/td] [td][/td] [td][/td] [td]:::[[User:Hmmmnnn|Hmmmnnn]] ([[User talk:Hmmmnnn|talk]]) 01:58, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:::[[User:Hmmmnnn|Hmmmnnn]] ([[User talk:Hmmmnnn|talk]]) 01:58, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
| Line 96: | Line 96: |
[td]
β Previous revision
[/td][td]
[td]:::* If you are concerned about words like 'however', you could remove that word rather than delete the entire paragraph.[/td]Revision as of 02:04, 30 August 2025
[/td][td]:::* If you are concerned about words like 'however', you could remove that word rather than delete the entire paragraph.[/td] [td]:::* You express concern about a 'free to use news platform.' Wikipedia is also a free use platform so that seems a very strange concern.[/td]
[td]:::* You express concern about a 'free to use news platform.' Wikipedia is also a free use platform so that seems a very strange concern.[/td] [td]:::* You then say the information on that platform (that Hobson's Pledge members supported the Treaty Principles Bill) is "not attributed to anyone", and that therefore it is not a reliable source. Here's another source that says "the conservative lobby group Hobsonβs Pledge submitted [on the Bill] with 24,706 signatories".[/td]
[td]:::* You then say the information on that platform (that Hobson's Pledge members supported the Treaty Principles Bill) is "not attributed to anyone", and that therefore it is not a reliable source. Here's another source that says "the conservative lobby group Hobsonβs Pledge submitted [on the Bill] with 24,706 signatories". So that negates your concern about that particular source.[/td] [td]:::* You also express concern about the source from RNZ, and seem to suggest there is a problem becasue the two sources are nine years apart. So what? What's your concern about that?[/td] [td][/td] [td][/td] [td][/td] [td]:::[[User:Hmmmnnn|Hmmmnnn]] ([[User talk:Hmmmnnn|talk]]) 01:58, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
[td]:::[[User:Hmmmnnn|Hmmmnnn]] ([[User talk:Hmmmnnn|talk]]) 01:58, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[/td]
Continue reading...
