A
Agustรญn Rodrรญguez
Guest
So, you've confirmed that your refactor is necessary.
Now it's time to plan it right โ because a poorly scoped or unstructured refactor is a trap that can drain weeks of work and leave everything worse than before.
Let's break it down.
There's no single "best" approach to refactoring, but here are common strategies โ and when to use them:
Refactor bit by bit, keeping the system functional at all times.
Fork the code into a separate branch, refactor freely, and merge later.
Wrap and slowly replace legacy logic, one endpoint or feature at a time.
One of the biggest risks in a refactor is the infinite scope creep.
You touch one piece, which leads to another, and then another... and before you know it, it's a rewrite.
Avoid this by:
Tip: Track tasks in a checklist. Treat each step like a mini-feature.
Before you start moving code around, ask yourself:
What kind of structure are we aiming for?
Without a vision, you'll likely make it different, not better.
Examples:
Refactor is not just renaming variables โ it's about redesigning how things work internally.
Even during a refactor, some parts of your system can't change โ external APIs, third-party expectations, or other modules still depending on them.
This makes it easier to refactor one part without breaking everything else.
If your refactor affects a feature that's already live, wrap the new version in a flag so you can:
This adds safety โ especially when combined with CI/CD pipelines.
You need different levels of tests to support your refactor:
Also, use coverage tools to find untested danger zones before you touch them.
Before writing any code:
Cover image credit: Chris Ried, via Unsplash
Continue reading...
Now it's time to plan it right โ because a poorly scoped or unstructured refactor is a trap that can drain weeks of work and leave everything worse than before.
Let's break it down.
Choose the Right Strategy
There's no single "best" approach to refactoring, but here are common strategies โ and when to use them:
1. Incremental Refactor (Recommended for Live Systems)
Refactor bit by bit, keeping the system functional at all times.
Pros: Safe, gradual, easier to test
Cons: Requires discipline and clear boundaries
Best for: Actively used systems, critical codebases, or anything in production
2. Branch-based Refactor (When Changes Are Too Invasive)
Fork the code into a separate branch, refactor freely, and merge later.
Pros: Total freedom to redesign
Cons: Merge hell, risk of long-living branches, hard to keep in sync
Best for: Isolated modules, internal tools, greenfield components
3. Strangler Fig Pattern (Great for Legacy Systems)
Wrap and slowly replace legacy logic, one endpoint or feature at a time.
Pros: Legacy coexists with new code, safer evolution
Cons: Requires architectural support (e.g., routing layers, boundaries)
Control the Scope or You'll Never Finish
One of the biggest risks in a refactor is the infinite scope creep.
You touch one piece, which leads to another, and then another... and before you know it, it's a rewrite.
Avoid this by:
- Defining clear boundaries โ "Only refactor the email dispatch logic"
- Having non-negotiable out-of-scope rules โ "Don't rewrite the frontend now"
- Splitting the work into atomic, testable steps

Pick an Architecture or Pattern (Don't Wing It)
Before you start moving code around, ask yourself:
What kind of structure are we aiming for?
Without a vision, you'll likely make it different, not better.
Examples:
- Clean or Hexagonal architecture
- Adapter pattern to swap external services
- Strategy pattern to simplify logic by behavior
- Service layer for reusable business logic
- Ports and adapters to isolate frameworks

Stabilize Interfaces (Create Contracts)
Even during a refactor, some parts of your system can't change โ external APIs, third-party expectations, or other modules still depending on them.
- Define stable interfaces or DTOs (data transfer objects)
- Keep method signatures consistent while you migrate under the hood
- Use adapters to convert legacy format to the new one temporarily
This makes it easier to refactor one part without breaking everything else.
Use Feature Flags
If your refactor affects a feature that's already live, wrap the new version in a flag so you can:
- Test it in staging
- Gradually roll it out
- Roll back instantly if needed
This adds safety โ especially when combined with CI/CD pipelines.
Define a Refactor Testing Strategy
You need different levels of tests to support your refactor:
- Unit tests for small modules
- Integration tests for connections between modules
- Regression tests to make sure nothing breaks
- (Optional) Snapshots or visual diffs for UIs

Checklist Before the First Commit
Before writing any code:
- [ ] Refactor strategy selected (Incremental, Branch, Strangler)
- [ ] Scope clearly defined and limited
- [ ] Architectural target or pattern chosen
- [ ] Interfaces/contracts stabilized
- [ ] Feature flags planned (if needed)
- [ ] Tests prepared or planned
- [ ] Metrics defined (to validate results later)
Cover image credit: Chris Ried, via Unsplash
Continue reading...