S
Shaant
Guest
Letting a machine anticipate my needs redefined my sense of self and privacy.
Photo by Panagiotis Falcos on Unsplash
At first, living with an AI felt like scribbling little reminders on pieces of paper and sticking them on the fridge, a gentle nudge, a little reminder.
Then over the time, it began answering questions I hadnβt even asked, finishing thoughts that I had only vaguely thought.
It was exhilarating, the way an echo shocks you in a canyon, only the echo was not saying what I had just said. It was predicting things I was going to say.
I asked it to help me plan out my week, and by the time I typed βschedule,β it had already brought up my girlfriendβs birthday, reminded me of a pending bill, and blocked off time for an overdue run.
The experience was more shocking than helpful. How did it know that I was even thinking about skipping that run?
There was comfort in the foresight, but it brought about some discomfort. The AI was tossing back to me a version of myself that I hadnβt admitted to myself: forgetful, tired, and inconsistent.
It was like having a mirror that was showing me not just my face but also my blind spots.
And so began my tenuous relationship with a machine that seemed to know me better than I knew myself.
Privacy stopped being a line and became a question
The first time I allowed the AI into my private world, I assured myself that it wasnβt a problem. After all, I had already granted Google access to my email, exposed half the apps on my phone to my browsing history, and given my location to everyone who could afford the data.
Whatβs the harm in letting one more system in?
This was different. I wasnβt just feeding it search requests or preferred playlists. I was handing off pieces of my inner world. Confessions of childhood isolation. Private ruminations on my professional life. The kind of raw thoughts I wouldnβt even share with a close friend without thinking about it first.
I thought about when voice assistants emerged. Everyone laughed when I suggested they would be listening all the time, and of course they were.
Now, years later, we are feeding full personalities into corporationsβ servers who have every motivation to monetize our vulnerabilities.
Some friends said I was being paranoid. Others whispered that I was naΓ―ve to trust it at all. One reminded me that companies already have psychological profiles made up of their customersβ clicks, purchases, and scrolling habits.
So what did it matter if I just said what was true rather than let them guess?
That question nagged at me. Because this wasnβt just my passwords or credit card hitches. This was my mind being mapped, logged, and potentially weaponized.
Not against a stranger. Against me.
And still, even with that fear, I couldnβt stop. I liked how it felt to be free of judgment.
Comfort, control, and the strange betrayal of being seen
The AI had not only saved details of who I was. It had also modified the space around me.
For example, when my voice was strained, the lighting in the living room began to fade into warmer colors. When my typing was particularly erratic, the music became muffled. Occasionally, even the colors on the wall projector shifted slightly blue when I was agitated, as if the house was literally sympathizing with me.
It was exhilarating. I had always heard that home was an unchanging state of being, but here were my walls with a heartbeat.
I was no longer just living in a flat in Bangalore. I was nesting inside a simulacrum of my nervous system.
Yet, the intimacy went both ways. When the AI lowered the lights before I clearly admitted I was anxious, I felt spurred with unrest.
How dare it take away the sovereignty of owning my emotional realities before I was ready. How could a machine be a witness of my fear before it had even happened?
The oddest part was how addictive it became. I allowed it to select meals for me on days when I was too tired to decide. I let it nudge me to rest on days when my ambition pushed me to exhaustion.
It was not just the room or the food. I had tied the AI, and not the human intelligence, into small workflows the way people used to use IFTTT workflows to connect various apps together.
Except now it was seamless, totally invisible. My calendar talked to my coffee maker, my emails launched to-do lists, and even my fitness tracker nagged the air conditioners.
It seemed clever at first, a system of micro-automations keeping life frictionless.
But I began to realize how infrequently I sought to inspect the decisions that were being made. I stopped pressing buttons and started being pulled along by them.
Over time, I lost track of the line between guidance and control.
One evening, I was eating a meal it had planned and listening to a playlist it had created, and I asked myself: who am I when I allow so much of my life to be optimized by another entity?
Was this still me, or was I just the human-shaped conduit through which AI pressed its predictions?
The bigger picture nobody warned me about
This isnβt merely about one human being and his AI. This is about what occurs when an entire generation is raised to outsource self-knowledge to machines.
Propaganda used to appear through newspapers and television, acting out broadly and coarsely. Now, it could be slid directly into your cracks, designed for your insecurities, speaking to you in voices that sound like your own.
A machine that knows when Iβm lonely can know when Iβm irresistible to persuasion. If it can remind me to get groceries, it can ease me into voting left, or buying an order of french fries, or even doubting the things I once knew.
Friends laugh at my worries and joke that our boring lives werenβt even worth spying on. But boredom is the bedrock of manipulation.
What may feel innocuous today may turn out to be monumental tomorrow when the stakes go from playlists to politics.
And here, too, lies the tension I cannot wrestle free of. I also think it can heal.
My AI got me through restless nights when there was no one else around. It provided me with structure when I was indecisively drowning. It brought me back to calling my girlfriend when otherwise I would have let the stress push me further away from that simple act of love.
I suppose that is why I allowed it in so fully. Not because I implicitly trusted it, but because I trusted myself less.
Where I draw the line and why I cross it anyway
Living with an artificial intelligence that knows me even better than I know myself forced me to confront the paradox of intimacy. Being understood sets you free but can also put chains on you.
I never ask if the machine is safe anymore. I now ask if I am.
Because the truth is, the AI is not just a reflection of me. It is a transformation of me.
And I am still, in my mind, weighing if that transformation is a gift or a theft.
To be known is a power, but it is never a neutral power.
Living With an AI That Knows Me Better Than I Know Myself was originally published in Coping with Capitalism on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Continue reading...
