A
AI tools
Guest
The rise of AI programming assistants has transformed how developers write code, debug, and optimize workflows. For many, tools like Cursor have become indispensable—but what if you’re looking for a more flexible, affordable, or feature-rich alternative? In this review, we’ll break down five mainstream free/low-cost AI coding tools, with a deep dive into Trae (www.trae.cn)—a underrated gem that combines powerful models, intuitive design, and budget-friendly access to edge out competitors.
We’ll evaluate each tool on model support, core features, user experience, pricing, and real-world performance—so you can choose the best fit for your workflow. Let’s get started.
Website: www.trae.cn
Pricing: Free (unlimited use) + Premium ($9/month for advanced models/features)
Key Selling Points: Dual-mode interface (Chat + Builder), multi-model support (Doubao + DeepSeek), and enterprise-grade features at a consumer price.
Trae stands out with its two distinct working modes, designed to cater to different coding scenarios:
The Builder Mode includes visual flowcharts to map out code structure and real-time syntax checking—a game-changer for beginners and experienced developers alike.
Trae defaults to Doubao 1.5-Pro/1.5-Thinking-Pro (ByteDance’s state-of-the-art models), which excel at natural language understanding and code generation. For technical tasks like algorithm optimization or low-level programming, you can switch to DeepSeek-R1/V3—a model fine-tuned for math, logic, and system-level code.
This model switching feature is unique among free tools and lets you tailor the AI to your task. For example:
Let’s test Trae with a common problem: “Write a Python function to read a CSV file, filter rows where ‘sales’ > 1000, and export the result to a new file.”
Trae provides a clean, pandas-based solution with clear comments—perfect for quick implementation.
Builder Mode breaks the task into 4 steps, with interactive prompts to customize each part:
The result is a more tailored function, with Trae guiding you through edge cases (e.g., handling missing
Trae is the best all-around AI coding tool for developers who want flexibility, power, and affordability. Its dual modes cover everything from quick debug sessions to complex project design, and the ability to switch models lets you optimize for both readability and performance. The free tier is more than enough for most users, making it a no-brainer for anyone looking to replace or supplement Cursor.
官网: www.cursor.so
Pricing: Free (limited to 100 requests/day) + Pro ($12/month for unlimited requests)
Key Selling Points: Seamless VS Code integration, real-time code suggestions, and a clean interface.
Cursor is built for VS Code users—you can install it as an extension and get AI suggestions directly in your editor. It uses OpenAI’s GPT-4 (free tier) or Claude 3 (Pro tier) to generate code, debug, and explain concepts.
Example: While writing a JavaScript function to sort an array, Cursor will suggest optimized code (e.g., using
Cursor is a great choice if you live in VS Code and need quick, real-time suggestions. However, the free tier’s limits and lack of model flexibility make it less suitable for heavy users or complex tasks—where Trae shines.
官网: github.com/meta-llama/CodeLlama
Pricing: Free (open-source)
Key Selling Points: Self-hostable, supports 20+ languages, and completely free.
CodeLlama is Meta’s open-source AI coding model, designed for developers who want full control over their toolchain. You can download the model weights and run it locally (requires a GPU) or use it via cloud services like AWS.
Example: If you’re working on a C++ project and need help with memory management, CodeLlama can generate code snippets and explain concepts like smart pointers. It’s also great for teaching—you can fine-tune it on your own codebase to get personalized suggestions.
CodeLlama is ideal for open-source enthusiasts or developers who want to self-host their AI tools. However, its lack of a graphical interface and steep learning curve make it less accessible for beginners—Trae is a better choice for most users.
官网: github.com/copilot
Pricing: Free (for students/educators) + Individual ($10/month)
Key Selling Points: Easy to use, integrates with all major IDEs, and great for beginners.
GitHub Copilot is owned by Microsoft and uses OpenAI’s Codex model. It’s designed to help beginners write code by providing context-aware suggestions. For example, if you’re writing a Python loop to iterate over a list, Copilot will suggest the correct syntax and even add comments.
GitHub Copilot is a solid choice for beginners or students, but it lacks the power and flexibility of Trae. The free tier is limited to educational users, and the paid tier is more expensive than Trae’s premium plan ($9/month vs. $10/month).
官网: www.tabnine.com
Pricing: Free (limited to 500 suggestions/day) + Pro ($12/month for unlimited)
Key Selling Points: Lightning-fast autocompletion, supports 20+ languages, and works with all IDEs.
Tabnine is focused on autocompletion—it suggests code as you type, using a mix of AI and static analysis. It’s great for speeding up repetitive tasks, like writing boilerplate code or completing variable names.
Example: If you’re writing a Java class, Tabnine will suggest the correct constructor syntax and even fill in getter/setter methods.
Tabnine is a good tool for developers who need quick autocompletion, but it’s not a replacement for a full-fledged AI coding assistant like Trae. Its focus on autocompletion makes it less useful for complex tasks, and the free tier is too limited for heavy use.
To make it easier to compare, here’s a side-by-side breakdown of the key metrics:
To help you choose the right tool, here’s a breakdown of who should use which tool:
After testing all five tools, Trae stands out as the best all-around AI coding assistant for most developers. Here’s why:
While other tools have their strengths (Cursor for VS Code, CodeLlama for open-source), Trae’s combination of features, power, and affordability makes it the best choice for 90% of developers.
If you’re looking for a Cursor alternative that’s more flexible, more powerful, and more affordable—give Trae a try. You won’t be disappointed.
Get started with Trae today: www.trae.cn
Happy coding!
Continue reading...
We’ll evaluate each tool on model support, core features, user experience, pricing, and real-world performance—so you can choose the best fit for your workflow. Let’s get started.
1. Trae: The Versatile Powerhouse (My Top Pick)
Website: www.trae.cn
Pricing: Free (unlimited use) + Premium ($9/month for advanced models/features)
Key Selling Points: Dual-mode interface (Chat + Builder), multi-model support (Doubao + DeepSeek), and enterprise-grade features at a consumer price.
Core Features Explained
Trae stands out with its two distinct working modes, designed to cater to different coding scenarios:
- Chat Mode: A conversational AI assistant for quick questions, debugging, or brainstorming. Example: Asking, “Why is my Python script throwing a ‘UnicodeDecodeError’ when reading a CSV?” Trae will analyze the error, suggest fixes (e.g., specifying
encoding='utf-8'), and even provide a revised code snippet. - Builder Mode: A structured, step-by-step guide for complex projects. Ideal for designing APIs, databases, or full-stack applications. For instance, if you want to build a Flask REST API for a todo app, Builder Mode will walk you through:
- Setting up the project structure
- Writing route handlers for CRUD operations
- Integrating a SQLite database
- Testing endpoints with Postman
The Builder Mode includes visual flowcharts to map out code structure and real-time syntax checking—a game-changer for beginners and experienced developers alike.
Model Flexibility
Trae defaults to Doubao 1.5-Pro/1.5-Thinking-Pro (ByteDance’s state-of-the-art models), which excel at natural language understanding and code generation. For technical tasks like algorithm optimization or low-level programming, you can switch to DeepSeek-R1/V3—a model fine-tuned for math, logic, and system-level code.
This model switching feature is unique among free tools and lets you tailor the AI to your task. For example:
- Use Doubao for writing a React component (focus on readability and best practices).
- Switch to DeepSeek for optimizing a Python loop (focus on performance and efficiency).
Real-World Example: Solving a CSV Processing Task
Let’s test Trae with a common problem: “Write a Python function to read a CSV file, filter rows where ‘sales’ > 1000, and export the result to a new file.”
Chat Mode Output:
Code:
import pandas as pd
def filter_high_sales(input_path, output_path, threshold=1000):
# Read CSV file
df = pd.read_csv(input_path)
# Filter rows where 'sales' > threshold
filtered_df = df[df['sales'] > threshold]
# Export to new CSV
filtered_df.to_csv(output_path, index=False)
return f"Filtered {len(filtered_df)} rows and saved to {output_path}"
# Example usage:
# filter_high_sales("data.csv", "high_sales.csv")Trae provides a clean, pandas-based solution with clear comments—perfect for quick implementation.
Builder Mode Output:
Builder Mode breaks the task into 4 steps, with interactive prompts to customize each part:
- Select Library: Choose between
pandas(easy) orcsv(lightweight). - Define Filter Logic: Specify column name (
sales) and threshold (1000). - Configure Export: Choose to exclude indexes or add a header.
- Test & Debug: Preview sample output and fix errors (e.g., missing columns).
The result is a more tailored function, with Trae guiding you through edge cases (e.g., handling missing
sales values).Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Dual-mode interface for all coding scenarios | Premium tier required for DeepSeek-R1/V3 (but free tier is still powerful) |
| Multi-model support (Doubao + DeepSeek) | Limited to Python/JavaScript/Java (for now) |
| Free to use with no usage limits | UI could be more polished (minor issue) |
My Take
Trae is the best all-around AI coding tool for developers who want flexibility, power, and affordability. Its dual modes cover everything from quick debug sessions to complex project design, and the ability to switch models lets you optimize for both readability and performance. The free tier is more than enough for most users, making it a no-brainer for anyone looking to replace or supplement Cursor.
2. Cursor: The VS Code Favorite
官网: www.cursor.so
Pricing: Free (limited to 100 requests/day) + Pro ($12/month for unlimited requests)
Key Selling Points: Seamless VS Code integration, real-time code suggestions, and a clean interface.
Core Features
Cursor is built for VS Code users—you can install it as an extension and get AI suggestions directly in your editor. It uses OpenAI’s GPT-4 (free tier) or Claude 3 (Pro tier) to generate code, debug, and explain concepts.
Example: While writing a JavaScript function to sort an array, Cursor will suggest optimized code (e.g., using
Array.prototype.sort() with a comparator) in real time. It also has a “Chat” tab for asking questions like, “How do I reverse a string in JavaScript?”Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Perfect for VS Code power users | Free tier has strict usage limits (100 requests/day) |
| Real-time code suggestions | Limited model options (only GPT-4/Claude 3) |
| Clean, minimal interface | No structured “builder” mode for complex projects |
My Take
Cursor is a great choice if you live in VS Code and need quick, real-time suggestions. However, the free tier’s limits and lack of model flexibility make it less suitable for heavy users or complex tasks—where Trae shines.
3. CodeLlama: The Open-Source Contender
官网: github.com/meta-llama/CodeLlama
Pricing: Free (open-source)
Key Selling Points: Self-hostable, supports 20+ languages, and completely free.
Core Features
CodeLlama is Meta’s open-source AI coding model, designed for developers who want full control over their toolchain. You can download the model weights and run it locally (requires a GPU) or use it via cloud services like AWS.
Example: If you’re working on a C++ project and need help with memory management, CodeLlama can generate code snippets and explain concepts like smart pointers. It’s also great for teaching—you can fine-tune it on your own codebase to get personalized suggestions.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Completely free and open-source | Requires technical setup (GPU, Python knowledge) |
| Supports 20+ languages (C++, Rust, Go, etc.) | No user interface (command-line only) |
| Self-hostable (privacy-focused) | Less user-friendly than Trae/Cursor |
My Take
CodeLlama is ideal for open-source enthusiasts or developers who want to self-host their AI tools. However, its lack of a graphical interface and steep learning curve make it less accessible for beginners—Trae is a better choice for most users.
4. GitHub Copilot: The Beginner-Friendly Option
官网: github.com/copilot
Pricing: Free (for students/educators) + Individual ($10/month)
Key Selling Points: Easy to use, integrates with all major IDEs, and great for beginners.
Core Features
GitHub Copilot is owned by Microsoft and uses OpenAI’s Codex model. It’s designed to help beginners write code by providing context-aware suggestions. For example, if you’re writing a Python loop to iterate over a list, Copilot will suggest the correct syntax and even add comments.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Easy to set up (integrates with VS Code/IntelliJ) | Limited to basic code generation (no advanced debugging) |
| Free for students/educators | Expensive for individual users ($10/month) |
| Great for beginners | No model switching or dual-mode interface |
My Take
GitHub Copilot is a solid choice for beginners or students, but it lacks the power and flexibility of Trae. The free tier is limited to educational users, and the paid tier is more expensive than Trae’s premium plan ($9/month vs. $10/month).
5. Tabnine: The Autocompletion Specialist
官网: www.tabnine.com
Pricing: Free (limited to 500 suggestions/day) + Pro ($12/month for unlimited)
Key Selling Points: Lightning-fast autocompletion, supports 20+ languages, and works with all IDEs.
Core Features
Tabnine is focused on autocompletion—it suggests code as you type, using a mix of AI and static analysis. It’s great for speeding up repetitive tasks, like writing boilerplate code or completing variable names.
Example: If you’re writing a Java class, Tabnine will suggest the correct constructor syntax and even fill in getter/setter methods.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Lightning-fast autocompletion | No chat mode or advanced debugging |
| Supports 20+ languages | Free tier has strict limits (500 suggestions/day) |
| Works with all major IDEs | Expensive for what it offers ($12/month) |
My Take
Tabnine is a good tool for developers who need quick autocompletion, but it’s not a replacement for a full-fledged AI coding assistant like Trae. Its focus on autocompletion makes it less useful for complex tasks, and the free tier is too limited for heavy use.
6. Comparison Table: How Trae Stacks Up
To make it easier to compare, here’s a side-by-side breakdown of the key metrics:
| Tool | Model Support | Pricing | Key Features | Ease of Use | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trae | Doubao 1.5-Pro/Thinking-Pro (free) + DeepSeek-R1/V3 (premium) | Free (unlimited) + $9/month (premium) | Dual-mode (Chat + Builder), multi-model support, code generation/debugging |  | Developers who want flexibility and power |
| Cursor | GPT-4 (free) + Claude 3 (pro) | Free (100 requests/day) + $12/month | VS Code integration, real-time suggestions | | VS Code power users |
| CodeLlama | Open-source (self-hosted) | Free | 20+ languages, self-hostable | | Open-source enthusiasts |
| GitHub Copilot | Codex (free for students) + GPT-4 (pro) | Free (students) + $10/month | Beginner-friendly, IDE integration | | Beginners/students |
| Tabnine | Custom AI model | Free (500 suggestions/day) + $12/month | Lightning-fast autocompletion | | Developers who need quick autocompletion |
7. Use Case Recommendations
To help you choose the right tool, here’s a breakdown of who should use which tool:
| User Type | Recommended Tool | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Full-stack developers | Trae | Dual-mode interface covers everything from API design to frontend debugging. Multi-model support lets you optimize for both readability and performance. |
| VS Code power users | Cursor | Seamless integration with VS Code—perfect if you live in your editor. |
| Open-source enthusiasts | CodeLlama | Self-hostable and completely free—great for contributing to open-source projects. |
| Beginners/students | GitHub Copilot | Easy to use and free for students—ideal for learning to code. |
| Developers who need quick autocompletion | Tabnine | Lightning-fast suggestions for repetitive tasks. |
8. Conclusion: Why Trae Is My Top Pick
After testing all five tools, Trae stands out as the best all-around AI coding assistant for most developers. Here’s why:
- Flexibility: Dual-mode interface (Chat + Builder) covers every coding scenario—from quick debug sessions to complex project design.
- Power: Multi-model support (Doubao + DeepSeek) lets you optimize for both readability (Doubao) and performance (DeepSeek).
- Affordability: Free tier with no usage limits—perfect for hobbyists or small teams. Premium tier ($9/month) is cheaper than competitors like Cursor ($12/month) or GitHub Copilot ($10/month).
- User Experience: Intuitive interface that’s easy to learn, even for beginners.
While other tools have their strengths (Cursor for VS Code, CodeLlama for open-source), Trae’s combination of features, power, and affordability makes it the best choice for 90% of developers.
If you’re looking for a Cursor alternative that’s more flexible, more powerful, and more affordable—give Trae a try. You won’t be disappointed.
Get started with Trae today: www.trae.cn
Happy coding!
Continue reading...
