Talk:Refusal to serve in the Israel Defense Forces

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 17:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 17:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

== Edit request 4 July 2025 ==

{{Edit extended-protected|answered=}}

'''Description of suggested change:'''

'''Diff:'''

{{TextDiff|1=ORIGINAL_TEXT|2=CHANGED_TEXT}} [[Special:Contributions/74.108.53.5|74.108.53.5]] ([[User talk:74.108.53.5|talk]]) 20:44, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

This sentence: "One of the 43 said he had access to the inquiry, and that it was faked, making out that the lieutenant had been ordered to ensure the targeted building was empty, which, he stated, was the opposite of the truth," is atrociously worded and makes very unclear because of its odd syntax who exactly is faking what. I suggest quoting from the relevant article directly:

"As an instructor I gave a class called “Morality and Intelligence”,which I had also participated in as a student. The Lieutenant A.Affair was a major part of this class. As an instructor I had access to the army’s inquiry into this affair. In hindsight I discovered that it had been a fake inquiry. The report said the objective of that operation was to demolish a building empty of people, and thatLieutenant A.’s job was to make sure the building was indeed empty– when in fact the contrary was true. The objective was to bomb a building containing innocent people, and the Lieutenant was supposed to inform the unit when they were inside. We discussed this affair in class."