6 days ago
3
'Attack against civilians': new section
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 16:48, 8 July 2025 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Never mind. I am not fully awake, I guess. After having reread the sentence some more times, I now understand what it says. [[User:Mark in wiki|Mark in wiki]] ([[User talk:Mark in wiki|talk]]) 15:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC) |
:Never mind. I am not fully awake, I guess. After having reread the sentence some more times, I now understand what it says. [[User:Mark in wiki|Mark in wiki]] ([[User talk:Mark in wiki|talk]]) 15:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
::For clarity, it might be a good idea to switch the order of the second and third sentences of the lead: first a description of the monument, and then a sentence about what it refers to. [[User:Mark in wiki|Mark in wiki]] ([[User talk:Mark in wiki|talk]]) 15:55, 8 July 2025 (UTC) |
::For clarity, it might be a good idea to switch the order of the second and third sentences of the lead: first a description of the monument, and then a sentence about what it refers to. [[User:Mark in wiki|Mark in wiki]] ([[User talk:Mark in wiki|talk]]) 15:55, 8 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
== 'Attack against civilians' == |
|||
'This was one of the first attacks by the Yugoslav forces against civilians in Croatia during the War of Independence.' |
|||
Honestly, calling this an attack against civilians seems a bit too POV even by the usual standards. If a civilian tries to impede the actions of military forces by using their car, the side initiating the clash is the civilian and not the military forces. In that case, that car being damaged is the least thing that the civilian can expect and certainly not some kind of atrocity or violation of humanitarian law on the part of the military forces, as the phrase 'attack against civilians' implies. [[Special:Contributions/78.154.14.90|78.154.14.90]] ([[User talk:78.154.14.90|talk]]) 16:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC) |
|||
