Expand second example calculation: Reply
← Previous revision | Revision as of 05:35, 8 July 2025 | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I have attempted calculations to identify the third winner in the example, and candidate C was the result, in contrast to the article currently indicating it is candidate B. I will change it to C for now. Maybe someone can fill it in with the calculation steps later. [[User:Re.educated|Re.educated]] ([[User talk:Re.educated|talk]]) 01:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC) |
:I have attempted calculations to identify the third winner in the example, and candidate C was the result, in contrast to the article currently indicating it is candidate B. I will change it to C for now. Maybe someone can fill it in with the calculation steps later. [[User:Re.educated|Re.educated]] ([[User talk:Re.educated|talk]]) 01:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
::Hi, |
|||
::doesnt B Pareto dominate C? I do not really see any reason why C should be elected as the third candidate. You can also verify it here: https://pref.tools/abcvoting/ [[User:Jannikp97|Jannikp97]] ([[User talk:Jannikp97|talk]]) 05:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC) |