4 days ago
3
Recent Supreme Court ruling: new section
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 11:59, 5 July 2025 | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
:I've now rewritten this paragraph to mention the entire Claremont litigation and reduce the description of last month's Supreme Court decision to an overview. Have also removed the paragraph on the state's high test scores in 2008. [[User:Spike-from-NH|Spike-from-NH]] ([[User talk:Spike-from-NH|talk]]) 10:24, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
:I've now rewritten this paragraph to mention the entire Claremont litigation and reduce the description of last month's Supreme Court decision to an overview. Have also removed the paragraph on the state's high test scores in 2008. [[User:Spike-from-NH|Spike-from-NH]] ([[User talk:Spike-from-NH|talk]]) 10:24, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
== Recent Supreme Court ruling == |
|||
I still think some of the commentary in this Boston Globe article belongs in this article. [https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/07/01/metro/nh-supreme-court-state-funding-k-12-public-schools-inadequate-unconstitutional/] But I leave that to others. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 11:59, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
|||
