6 days ago
4
RFC (2): Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 16:47, 8 July 2025 | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
*'''A triple No''' (Invited by the bot), The lead should be a summary of the article, not putting in some trivial factoids just for bad optics. Petty offenses unrelated to his main activities and roles are not useful or informative for the article, much less the lead. Sincerely, <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 14:40, 1 July 2025 (UTC) |
*'''A triple No''' (Invited by the bot), The lead should be a summary of the article, not putting in some trivial factoids just for bad optics. Petty offenses unrelated to his main activities and roles are not useful or informative for the article, much less the lead. Sincerely, <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 14:40, 1 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
*:This user should be looked at. He does nothing other than insert this crap https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mikebarrett0 - [[Special:Contributions/61.8.154.240|61.8.154.240]] ([[User talk:61.8.154.240|talk]]) 15:34, 1 July 2025 (UTC) |
*:This user should be looked at. He does nothing other than insert this crap https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mikebarrett0 - [[Special:Contributions/61.8.154.240|61.8.154.240]] ([[User talk:61.8.154.240|talk]]) 15:34, 1 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
*::I've edited alongside [[User:North8000|North8000]] for years, and while we don't always agree, I've always known their edits to be in good faith. [[User:Penguino35|Penguino35]] ([[User talk:Penguino35|talk]]) 16:47, 8 July 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Yes''', per Guliolopez. A sentence summarising the court appearances is justified in the lede, when they are covered more substantially in the body and there are extensive RS to back them up. I'd leave out the shoplifting charge - struck out is struck out. [[User:Bastun|<span style="padding:3px;background:#ffa502;">Bastun</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Bastun|Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!]]</sup> 17:06, 1 July 2025 (UTC) |
* '''Yes''', per Guliolopez. A sentence summarising the court appearances is justified in the lede, when they are covered more substantially in the body and there are extensive RS to back them up. I'd leave out the shoplifting charge - struck out is struck out. [[User:Bastun|<span style="padding:3px;background:#ffa502;">Bastun</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Bastun|Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!]]</sup> 17:06, 1 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
