Talk:Grooming gangs scandal

2 weeks ago 440

Requested move 1 July 2025: if I had meant to bold that I would have

← Previous revision		Revision as of 16:02, 4 July 2025
Line 425:		Line 425:
	**:I'm really not sure there is strong evidence to be making any sweeping statement about ethnicity, the best secondary sources seem to agree that ethnicity data is poorly recorded and fraught with problems in its interpretation. [[User:LeChatiliers Pupper\|LeChatiliers Pupper]] ([[User talk:LeChatiliers Pupper\|talk]]) 13:57, 3 July 2025 (UTC)		**:I'm really not sure there is strong evidence to be making any sweeping statement about ethnicity, the best secondary sources seem to agree that ethnicity data is poorly recorded and fraught with problems in its interpretation. [[User:LeChatiliers Pupper\|LeChatiliers Pupper]] ([[User talk:LeChatiliers Pupper\|talk]]) 13:57, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
	*:That's probably something that should be kept an eye on as the cover-up is investigated.[[User:Halbared\|Halbared]] ([[User talk:Halbared\|talk]]) 21:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)		*:That's probably something that should be kept an eye on as the cover-up is investigated.[[User:Halbared\|Halbared]] ([[User talk:Halbared\|talk]]) 21:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
	:'''Support''', articles should be named for the subject not newspaper hradlines. -- <small>LCU</small> '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested\|A<small>ctively</small>D<small>isinterested</small>]]''' <small>''«[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested\|@]]» °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested\|∆t]]°''</small> 09:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)		:Support, articles should be named for the subject not newspaper hradlines. -- <small>LCU</small> '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested\|A<small>ctively</small>D<small>isinterested</small>]]''' <small>''«[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested\|@]]» °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested\|∆t]]°''</small> 09:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
	:'''Oppose''' as this is about the specific scandal and the proposed title is too broad. I don't think we should be going through a repeat of what happened last time (one of the more embarrassing things on this site). Also see Astaire's comment, and I would also agree with Tamsier. — '''[[User:Czello\|<i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i>]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Czello\|<i style="color:#8000FF">music</i>]])''</sup> 09:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)		:'''Oppose''' as this is about the specific scandal and the proposed title is too broad. I don't think we should be going through a repeat of what happened last time (one of the more embarrassing things on this site). Also see Astaire's comment, and I would also agree with Tamsier. — '''[[User:Czello\|<i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i>]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Czello\|<i style="color:#8000FF">music</i>]])''</sup> 09:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)