Talk:Grifola frondosa

5 days ago 3

Pulled Section: Reply

← Previous revision Revision as of 09:17, 7 July 2025
Line 9: Line 9:


The following section was formerly in the article, but it is not appropriate for Wikipedia, reading as an advertisement, containing non-notable research, and referenced by a source that I cannot seem to trace. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|אמר]]</small> [[User:The_Thadman|<b style="color:#0033CC; font-family:monospace, monospace;">Steve Caruso</b>]] 20:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
The following section was formerly in the article, but it is not appropriate for Wikipedia, reading as an advertisement, containing non-notable research, and referenced by a source that I cannot seem to trace. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|אמר]]</small> [[User:The_Thadman|<b style="color:#0033CC; font-family:monospace, monospace;">Steve Caruso</b>]] 20:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

:May I suggest to add if not a section, then at least reference to recent reviews? e.g. There are reviews of D-faction extracted from Maitake, including completed Phase I/II [[clinical trial]] demonstrating that "Treatment with sulfated polysaccharide obtained from Grifola frondosa (S-GFB) resulted in apoptosis of HepG2 cells", and "In a phase I/II trial of breast cancer survivors, Grifola frondosa extract acted as an immunomodulator." Same trial has concluded: "There appears to be no “maximum dose”, only “optimal dose” depending on the immunologic endpoint."[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751581/] [[User:Xobbitua|Xobbitua]] ([[User talk:Xobbitua|talk]]) 09:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)


<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Open Full Post