8 hours ago
5
Claims made in article: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 04:04, 6 July 2025 | ||
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
:::::I'm really not enjoying this right now. You've ignored my advice multiple times already. Still don't think you understand why so much of this behavior is raising red flags. [[User:Grapesurgeon|grapesurgeon]] (seefooddiet) ([[User talk:Grapesurgeon|talk]]) 10:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC) |
:::::I'm really not enjoying this right now. You've ignored my advice multiple times already. Still don't think you understand why so much of this behavior is raising red flags. [[User:Grapesurgeon|grapesurgeon]] (seefooddiet) ([[User talk:Grapesurgeon|talk]]) 10:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC) |
||
::::::Okay. Then how should this be made then? The statement "widely agreed" does not have any proof to support it, as there are no polls regarding it. The citations were made by several mainstream media that did not have the statistics to prove that this was widely agreed by the society. Major companies in Korea, such as Nexon has ikened the fingers to the English racial slur nigger, saying an expression must be redacted if it can be read as hate speech. It's the newspaper media that has agreed this to be a hoax. Could you give me any suggestions? [[User:Someone123454321|Someone123454321]] ([[User talk:Someone123454321|talk]]) 03:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC) |
::::::Okay. Then how should this be made then? The statement "widely agreed" does not have any proof to support it, as there are no polls regarding it. The citations were made by several mainstream media that did not have the statistics to prove that this was widely agreed by the society. Major companies in Korea, such as Nexon has ikened the fingers to the English racial slur nigger, saying an expression must be redacted if it can be read as hate speech. It's the newspaper media that has agreed this to be a hoax. Could you give me any suggestions? [[User:Someone123454321|Someone123454321]] ([[User talk:Someone123454321|talk]]) 03:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC) |
||
:::::::My comment was specifically about your behavior and poor understanding of Wikipedia policy. I did not comment on the situation. |
|||
:::::::I'll comment now. We go by what [[WP:RS]] say, and there is a round consensus in RS both in South Korea and internationally. |
|||
:::::::'''Companies are generally not considered RS, especially when they are directly involved in a dispute'''. We're not supposed to insert our own personal opinions by siding with involved parties in disputes like that. Also your comparison between the word "nigger", which has connotations of centuries of slavery behind it, to women using a childish but sexist insult against men, is... Think about that a little. |
|||
:::::::I'm frankly tired of your obvious POV pushing. To be clear, I myself had issues with this article; you can scroll up and see my lengthy debate and feedback about it. There are still aspects of the article I have issues with. But man I was nowhere close to this abrasive while giving the feedback. Really unnecessarily unpleasant working with you. [[User:Grapesurgeon|grapesurgeon]] (seefooddiet) ([[User talk:Grapesurgeon|talk]]) 04:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== About the gender inequality tag in the article == |
== About the gender inequality tag in the article == |
||
