Sourcing, tone, detail: new section
← Previous revision | Revision as of 10:40, 5 July 2025 | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::The claim about the dunce cap is extraordinary and needs better sources than the two references to television episodes. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 22:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC) |
::The claim about the dunce cap is extraordinary and needs better sources than the two references to television episodes. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 22:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC) |
||
:::I have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A51.7.26.148&diff=1297343244&oldid=1296725389 asked] the IP editor to join this discussion. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 16:03, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |
:::I have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A51.7.26.148&diff=1297343244&oldid=1296725389 asked] the IP editor to join this discussion. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 16:03, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |
||
== Sourcing, tone, detail == |
|||
This discussion started above under "Revert", but a new section may be helpful. I have just removed the name of Neilson's sister per [[WP:BLPNAME]], plus information sourced to birth and death certificates ([[WP:PRIMARY]]) or television programmes (I asked about that at the teahouse), plus information about ancestry not directly relevant and poorly sourced, plus some overly-detailed information such as her favourite books. There is still a lot of information sourced to television programmes, too much detail and tone issues - "tributes poured in". IP editor(s), please read the guidance on [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Please remember that if you knew Neilson you should not usually edit the page - see [[WP:COI|the conflict of interest policy]]. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 10:40, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |