Talk:Alex Breingan

5 days ago 4

Subject Balance: Reply

← Previous revision Revision as of 02:40, 5 July 2025
Line 32: Line 32:


This article in regards to the business outcome isn't fairly sourced. It only cites sources from a single journalist which doesn't demonstrate independent or broad recognition. This does present concerns around WP:UNDUE and WP:RS. Without substantial, independent coverage from multiple sources, the information on the business outcome needs to be notable which depending on a single journalist, doesn't cover Wikipedia's inclusion standards. Maybe I am wrong, but having an expert to check would be suitable. [[User:HammerDanceLi|HammerDanceLi]] ([[User talk:HammerDanceLi|talk]]) 01:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
This article in regards to the business outcome isn't fairly sourced. It only cites sources from a single journalist which doesn't demonstrate independent or broad recognition. This does present concerns around WP:UNDUE and WP:RS. Without substantial, independent coverage from multiple sources, the information on the business outcome needs to be notable which depending on a single journalist, doesn't cover Wikipedia's inclusion standards. Maybe I am wrong, but having an expert to check would be suitable. [[User:HammerDanceLi|HammerDanceLi]] ([[User talk:HammerDanceLi|talk]]) 01:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

:As noted uppage, if you feel that the ''New Zealand Herald'''s coverage is unfair, you should raise it directly with them, or with the New Zealand Media Council. Wikipedia is not the proper place to litigate such issues. [[User:IdiotSavant|IdiotSavant]] ([[User talk:IdiotSavant|talk]]) 02:40, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Open Full Post