Fans of Squid Game have long debated how the Frontman and Il-Nam managed to navigate their way through the deadly challenges. While some of these theories may seem straightforward, others reveal subtle, clever strategies that ensured their survival. Letโs delve deeper into their methods, uncovering the tactics and hidden safeguards that kept them alive.
The Frontmanโs Strategy: Survival Through Power and Deception
1. Avoiding the First Game
In the first game, Red Light, Green Light, the Frontman strategically chose not to participate. With 455 other players in the arena, his absence went largely unnoticed. This initial decision not only protected him from immediate danger but also positioned him as an overseer rather than a competitor.
2. Controlling Outcomes in the Second Game
The second game, Dalgona Candy, showcased the Frontmanโs manipulative planning. His team conveniently went last, despite being surrounded by other players during the discussion. This ensured he could observe others’ strategies and adapt accordingly. If his team lost, guards were instructed to wait until the remaining team left before eliminating his group, sparing him as a potential pawn for future schemes.
3. Escaping Chaos During the Team Game
The Tug of War game posed unique challenges. By ensuring his teamโs composition and strategy aligned with success, the Frontman minimized risks. Even during chaotic team formations, he isolated himself to avoid unnecessary conflict. If cornered, his influence over the guards could guarantee intervention, ensuring his survival.
4. Surviving the Special Game
In the special game, the Frontman relied on guards stationed nearby and advanced surveillance systems. Thermal cameras and night vision ensured he was never truly at risk. His dominance and display of power discouraged players from targeting him, making him an unlikely victim.
Il-Namโs Tactics: A Hidden Mastermind
1. Immunity in the First Game
Il-Namโs survival in Red Light, Green Light hinged on the dollโs programming. Unlike others, it was set not to scan him, allowing him to move freely even if he failed to stop on time. This clever safeguard made the game essentially risk-free for him.
2. Confidence in the Dalgona Game
During the Dalgona Candy challenge, Il-Nam allowed others to choose their shapes first. He exuded confidence, knowing he could manipulate outcomes. Even if he broke the shape, guards would overlook it, ensuring his survival.
3. Calculated Risks in the Tug of War
The Tug of War presented an illusion of risk. Il-Namโs shackle wasnโt locked, giving him the option to escape if his team lost. Additionally, delays in cutting the rope after his teamโs victory implied external control over the outcome, further ensuring his safety.
4. Exiting Before the Glass Bridge Game
The Marble Game was strategically chosen as Il-Namโs exit point. By feigning weakness and bowing out, he avoided the unpredictable and dangerous Glass Bridge game, where survival couldnโt be guaranteed without exposing his true identity.
Key Differences Between the Frontman and Il-Nam
While both characters had elaborate strategies, their motivations and methods diverged. Il-Nam participated for entertainment, using the games as a thrilling diversion. Conversely, the Frontmanโs involvement stemmed from a need to control and intervene, ensuring the games remained entertaining and suspenseful.
Conclusion
Neither the Frontman nor Il-Nam faced real danger in the games. Their strategies, combined with their influence over the guards and knowledge of the games, ensured their survival. These insights highlight the contrast between players genuinely fighting for survival and those manipulating the system for personal gain.
For more in-depth analyses of Squid Game, stay tuned!