Criticisms and Debates: phrase
← Previous revision | Revision as of 18:03, 9 July 2025 | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
There is also skepticism about whether the Bank’s development-oriented projects truly reach marginalized communities most affected by historical injustices. Critics highlight the need for more grassroots-led initiatives and participatory planning to ensure that reparative efforts are inclusive and locally relevant.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Okafor |first=Obiora Chinedu |title=Reparations for Africa: Rhetoric or Reality? |journal=Human Rights Review |volume=15 |issue=4 |year=2014 |pages=389–408}}</ref> |
There is also skepticism about whether the Bank’s development-oriented projects truly reach marginalized communities most affected by historical injustices. Critics highlight the need for more grassroots-led initiatives and participatory planning to ensure that reparative efforts are inclusive and locally relevant.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Okafor |first=Obiora Chinedu |title=Reparations for Africa: Rhetoric or Reality? |journal=Human Rights Review |volume=15 |issue=4 |year=2014 |pages=389–408}}</ref> |
||
Nonetheless, proponents argue that multilateral development banks like the AfDB remain essential platforms for negotiating African interests on the global stage. |
|||
== References == |
== References == |